Covariant vs Mov.ai
Covariant vs Mov.ai, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Covariant is on 61/100 and Mov.ai on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Covariant
- our overall score: 61/100 against 56/100
- domain rating: 60/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 43 against 25
- funding raised: $80.0M against $15.7M
- LinkedIn following: 27,403 against 5,165
Mov.ai
- agent readiness: 31/100 against 23/100
At a glance
| Measure | Covariant | Mov.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Covariant builds a universal AI platform, the Covariant Brain, to enable robots to see, reason, and act autonomously in dynamic real-world environments like warehouses. | Robotics Engine platform for building and deploying industrial robots quickly. |
| Category | Robotics, Industrial Robotics, Warehouse Robotics, Computer Vision | Industrial, Robotics, Robotics OS, Industrial Robotics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Emeryville, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Covariant | Mov.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 43 | 25 |
| Total funding | $80.0M | $15.7M |
| Latest round | Series C | Funding Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,403 | 5,165 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Covariant | Mov.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 42/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (23/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 43/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Covariant | Mov.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Netlify | Not detected |
Covariant vs Mov.ai: common questions
Which is better, Covariant or Mov.ai?
On our 0-100 score Covariant rates higher (61/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Covariant and Mov.ai compare on the numbers?
Covariant leads on our overall score (61/100 against 56/100), domain rating (60/100 against 43/100), headcount (43 against 25), funding raised ($80.0M against $15.7M), LinkedIn following (27,403 against 5,165). Mov.ai leads on agent readiness (31/100 against 23/100).
Read the full Covariant review and pricing or the Mov.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Covariant alternatives we track.