Covariant vs Formic
Covariant vs Formic, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Covariant is on 61/100 and Formic on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Covariant
- domain rating: 60/100 against 51/100
- LinkedIn following: 27,403 against 16,959
Formic
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 23/100
- headcount: 106 against 43
- funding raised: $159M against $80.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Covariant | Formic |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Covariant builds a universal AI platform, the Covariant Brain, to enable robots to see, reason, and act autonomously in dynamic real-world environments like warehouses. | Robots-as-a-Service (RaaS) for U.S. manufacturers, offering flexible, low-risk automation. |
| Category | Robotics, Industrial Robotics, Warehouse Robotics, Computer Vision | Industrial Automation, Robotics, Robots-as-a-Service, Manufacturing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software | hardware | services | platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Emeryville, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Covariant | Formic |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 43 | 106 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +41.8% |
| Total funding | $80.0M | $159M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A Extension |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,403 | 16,959 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Covariant | Formic |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 42/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (23/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 51/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Covariant | Formic |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Netlify |
| CDN | Netlify | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Covariant vs Formic: common questions
Which is better, Covariant or Formic?
On our 0-100 score Formic rates higher (62/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Covariant and Formic compare on the numbers?
Covariant leads on domain rating (60/100 against 51/100), LinkedIn following (27,403 against 16,959). Formic leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 23/100), headcount (106 against 43), funding raised ($159M against $80.0M).
Read the full Covariant review and pricing or the Formic review and pricing. You can also browse other Covariant alternatives we track.