Covariant vs Deep Learning Robotics
Covariant vs Deep Learning Robotics, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Covariant is on 61/100 and Deep Learning Robotics on 38/100.
Where each one leads
Covariant
- our overall score: 61/100 against 38/100
- domain rating: 60/100 against 12/100
- headcount: 43 against 5
- funding raised: $80.0M against $500K
- LinkedIn following: 27,403 against 889
Deep Learning Robotics
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Covariant | Deep Learning Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Covariant builds a universal AI platform, the Covariant Brain, to enable robots to see, reason, and act autonomously in dynamic real-world environments like warehouses. | Deep Learning Robotics provides AI-based software (DLRob) for industrial robotic arms, enabling automation through human demonstrations. |
| Category | Robotics, Industrial Robotics, Warehouse Robotics, Computer Vision | Industrial, Robotics, Industrial Robotics, Robotics OS |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Emeryville, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Covariant | Deep Learning Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 43 | 5 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +15.2% |
| Total funding | $80.0M | $500K |
| Latest round | Series C | Pre-Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,403 | 889 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Covariant | Deep Learning Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 38/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 36/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 42/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (23/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 12/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Covariant | Deep Learning Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Not detected |
| CDN | Netlify | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Wix |
Covariant vs Deep Learning Robotics: common questions
Which is better, Covariant or Deep Learning Robotics?
On our 0-100 score Covariant rates higher (61/100 against 38/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Covariant and Deep Learning Robotics compare on the numbers?
Covariant leads on our overall score (61/100 against 38/100), domain rating (60/100 against 12/100), headcount (43 against 5), funding raised ($80.0M against $500K), LinkedIn following (27,403 against 889).
Read the full Covariant review and pricing or the Deep Learning Robotics review and pricing. You can also browse other Covariant alternatives we track.