Countly vs Starburst
Countly vs Starburst, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Countly is on 55/100 and Starburst on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Countly
- agent readiness: 56/100 against 40/100
Starburst
- our overall score: 67/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 537 against 40
- funding raised: $414M against $1.1M
- LinkedIn following: 50,638 against 27,500
At a glance
| Measure | Countly | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Product analytics and customer engagement platform built on an open-source, self-hosted foundation. | Data platform for apps and AI, unifying distributed data for analytics and AI innovation. |
| Category | Analytics, Data Management, Product Analytics, Customer Engagement | AI, AI Infrastructure, Analytics, Analytics Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Countly | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 40 | 537 |
| Total funding | $1.1M | $414M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $3.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,500 | 50,638 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Countly | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 48/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (56/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Countly | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Countly vs Starburst: common questions
Which is better, Countly or Starburst?
On our 0-100 score Starburst rates higher (67/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Countly and Starburst compare on the numbers?
Countly leads on agent readiness (56/100 against 40/100). Starburst leads on our overall score (67/100 against 55/100), headcount (537 against 40), funding raised ($414M against $1.1M), LinkedIn following (50,638 against 27,500).
Read the full Countly review and pricing or the Starburst review and pricing. You can also browse other Countly alternatives we track.