Countly vs SQream
Countly vs SQream, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Countly is on 55/100 and SQream on 48/100.
Where each one leads
Countly
- our overall score: 55/100 against 48/100
- agent readiness: 56/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 52/100
- LinkedIn following: 27,500 against 13,741
SQream
- funding raised: $118M against $1.1M
At a glance
| Measure | Countly | SQream |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Product analytics and customer engagement platform built on an open-source, self-hosted foundation. | SQream provides a GPU-accelerated data analytics platform for rapidly analyzing massive datasets at scale. |
| Category | Analytics, Data Management, Product Analytics, Customer Engagement | Analytics, Enterprise, SQL, Database |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Countly | SQream |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 40 | 42 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -27.8% |
| Total funding | $1.1M | $118M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,500 | 13,741 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Countly | SQream |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (56/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 52/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Countly | SQream |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Countly | SQream |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 6 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads |
“Why SQream uses Haskell.”r/haskell
Countly vs SQream: common questions
Which is better, Countly or SQream?
On our 0-100 score Countly rates higher (55/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Countly and SQream compare on the numbers?
Countly leads on our overall score (55/100 against 48/100), agent readiness (56/100 against 47/100), domain rating (73/100 against 52/100), LinkedIn following (27,500 against 13,741). SQream leads on funding raised ($118M against $1.1M).
What do real users say about Countly and SQream?
SQream: 6 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/haskell.
Read the full Countly review and pricing or the SQream review and pricing. You can also browse other Countly alternatives we track.