Countly vs Glassbox
Countly vs Glassbox, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Countly is on 55/100 and Glassbox on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Countly
- agent readiness: 56/100 against 44/100
- LinkedIn following: 27,500 against 16,201
Glassbox
- headcount: 279 against 40
- funding raised: $71.5M against $1.1M
At a glance
| Measure | Countly | Glassbox |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Product analytics and customer engagement platform built on an open-source, self-hosted foundation. | Empowers organizations to manage and optimize the entire digital customer lifecycle with big data analytics. |
| Category | Analytics, Data Management, Product Analytics, Customer Engagement | Enterprise, Customer Support, Customer Experience, Digital |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Countly | Glassbox |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 40 | 279 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -0.9% |
| Total funding | $1.1M | $71.5M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,500 | 16,201 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Countly | Glassbox |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (56/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Countly | Glassbox |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Countly vs Glassbox: common questions
Which is better, Countly or Glassbox?
On our 0-100 score Glassbox rates higher (57/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Countly and Glassbox compare on the numbers?
Countly leads on agent readiness (56/100 against 44/100), LinkedIn following (27,500 against 16,201). Glassbox leads on headcount (279 against 40), funding raised ($71.5M against $1.1M).
Read the full Countly review and pricing or the Glassbox review and pricing. You can also browse other Countly alternatives we track.