Couchbase vs Silk
Couchbase vs Silk, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Couchbase is on 41/100 and Silk on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Couchbase
- agent readiness: 25/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 79/100 against 50/100
- headcount: 853 against 490
- LinkedIn following: 70,859 against 5,024
Silk
- our overall score: 63/100 against 41/100
- funding raised: $238M against $39.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Couchbase | Silk |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A leading cloud-native distributed SQL database for modern applications. | Silk provides a data virtualization platform for cloud workloads, accelerating performance without refactoring. |
| Category | Database, Distributed Database, NoSQL, SQL | Database, Enterprise, Optimization, Virtualization |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Couchbase | Silk |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 853 | 490 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +25.0% |
| Total funding | $39.0M | $238M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series G |
| Valuation | Not published | $550M |
| LinkedIn followers | 70,859 | 5,024 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Couchbase | Silk |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 41/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 44/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Couchbase | Silk |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Couchbase vs Silk: common questions
Which is better, Couchbase or Silk?
On our 0-100 score Silk rates higher (63/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Couchbase and Silk compare on the numbers?
Couchbase leads on agent readiness (25/100 against 21/100), domain rating (79/100 against 50/100), headcount (853 against 490), LinkedIn following (70,859 against 5,024). Silk leads on our overall score (63/100 against 41/100), funding raised ($238M against $39.0M).
Read the full Couchbase review and pricing or the Silk review and pricing. You can also browse other Couchbase alternatives we track.