Couchbase vs ScyllaDB
Couchbase vs ScyllaDB, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Couchbase is on 41/100 and ScyllaDB on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Couchbase
- headcount: 853 against 225
- LinkedIn following: 70,859 against 28,743
ScyllaDB
- our overall score: 67/100 against 41/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 25/100
- funding raised: $101M against $39.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Couchbase | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A leading cloud-native distributed SQL database for modern applications. | ScyllaDB is a high-performance, low-latency NoSQL database for data-intensive applications, designed to scale with modern infrastructure. |
| Category | Database, Distributed Database, NoSQL, SQL | Database, Enterprise, NoSQL, NoSQL Database |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Couchbase | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 853 | 225 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +13.6% |
| Total funding | $39.0M | $101M |
| Latest round | Series D | Debt |
| LinkedIn followers | 70,859 | 28,743 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Couchbase | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 41/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 44/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Couchbase | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Couchbase | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads |
“My custom RDBMS is 588,235x faster than ScyllaDB on my laptop with fsync on executing a complex HTAP query.”r/Database
Couchbase vs ScyllaDB: common questions
Which is better, Couchbase or ScyllaDB?
On our 0-100 score ScyllaDB rates higher (67/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Couchbase and ScyllaDB compare on the numbers?
Couchbase leads on headcount (853 against 225), LinkedIn following (70,859 against 28,743). ScyllaDB leads on our overall score (67/100 against 41/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 25/100), funding raised ($101M against $39.0M).
What do real users say about Couchbase and ScyllaDB?
ScyllaDB: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Database.
Read the full Couchbase review and pricing or the ScyllaDB review and pricing. You can also browse other Couchbase alternatives we track.