Cosm vs Surgical Theater
Cosm vs Surgical Theater, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cosm is on 47/100 and Surgical Theater on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Cosm
- agent readiness: 40/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 67/100 against 39/100
- headcount: 667 against 85
- funding raised: $63.0M against $9.0M
- LinkedIn following: 36,249 against 9,557
Surgical Theater
- our overall score: 55/100 against 47/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cosm | Surgical Theater |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Immersive media company blending high-resolution video, GPU-driven rendering, and venue-scale environments for shared reality experiences. | Surgical Theater combines fighter jet flight simulation technology with patient anatomy scans to create 360°-3D virtual reality for surgical planning and navigation. |
| Category | Immersive Technology, Media and Entertainment, Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality | Healthcare, Surgery, Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Los Angeles, USA | Cleveland, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cosm | Surgical Theater |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 667 | 85 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +16.8% |
| Total funding | $63.0M | $9.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 36,249 | 9,557 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cosm | Surgical Theater |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 39/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 67/100 | 39/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cosm | Surgical Theater |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
Cosm vs Surgical Theater: common questions
Which is better, Cosm or Surgical Theater?
On our 0-100 score Surgical Theater rates higher (55/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cosm and Surgical Theater compare on the numbers?
Cosm leads on agent readiness (40/100 against 30/100), domain rating (67/100 against 39/100), headcount (667 against 85), funding raised ($63.0M against $9.0M), LinkedIn following (36,249 against 9,557). Surgical Theater leads on our overall score (55/100 against 47/100).
Read the full Cosm review and pricing or the Surgical Theater review and pricing. You can also browse other Cosm alternatives we track.