Cosm vs Meta
Cosm vs Meta, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cosm is on 47/100 and Meta on 81/100.
Where each one leads
Cosm
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Meta
- our overall score: 81/100 against 47/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 67/100
- headcount: 150,835 against 667
- funding raised: $40B against $63.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Cosm | Meta |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Immersive media company blending high-resolution video, GPU-driven rendering, and venue-scale environments for shared reality experiences. | Leading social media and technology platform connecting billions of people globally. |
| Category | Immersive Technology, Media and Entertainment, Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality | Social Media, Advertising, Virtual Reality, Metaverse |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Platform | Services | Advertising |
| Founded | 2020 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | Los Angeles, USA | Menlo Park, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cosm | Meta |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 667 | 150,835 |
| Total funding | $63.0M | $40B |
| Latest round | Series B | Post-IPO Debt |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 36,249 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cosm | Meta |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 81/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 39/100 | 49/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 99/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 67/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cosm | Meta |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
Cosm vs Meta: common questions
Which is better, Cosm or Meta?
On our 0-100 score Meta rates higher (81/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cosm and Meta compare on the numbers?
Meta leads on our overall score (81/100 against 47/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 40/100), domain rating (91/100 against 67/100), headcount (150,835 against 667), funding raised ($40B against $63.0M).
Read the full Cosm review and pricing or the Meta review and pricing. You can also browse other Cosm alternatives we track.