Cortica vs Smart Eye
Cortica vs Smart Eye, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cortica is on 58/100 and Smart Eye on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Cortica
- our overall score: 58/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 32/100 against 27/100
- funding raised: $63.4M against $3.9M
Smart Eye
- domain rating: 67/100 against 28/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cortica | Smart Eye |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cortica develops Autonomous AI technology based on proprietary brain research for visual understanding in autonomous platforms. | Global leader in Human Insight AI, developing technology to understand, support, and predict human behavior for automotive and research applications. |
| Category | Image, Video Recognition, Video, Analytics | Human Insight AI, AI, Driver Monitoring System, Interior Sensing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software | hardware | platform |
| Founded | 2007 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Gothenburg, Sweden |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cortica | Smart Eye |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 28 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +8.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $63.4M | $3.9M |
| Latest round | Series D | Seed |
| Valuation | $200M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,975 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cortica | Smart Eye |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 33/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 17/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 12/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | F (27/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 28/100 | 67/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cortica | Smart Eye |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | AWS |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Cortica vs Smart Eye: common questions
Which is better, Cortica or Smart Eye?
On our 0-100 score Cortica rates higher (58/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cortica and Smart Eye compare on the numbers?
Cortica leads on our overall score (58/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (32/100 against 27/100), funding raised ($63.4M against $3.9M). Smart Eye leads on domain rating (67/100 against 28/100).
Read the full Cortica review and pricing or the Smart Eye review and pricing. You can also browse other Cortica alternatives we track.