Cortea vs Iris.ai
Cortea vs Iris.ai, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cortea is on 54/100 and Iris.ai on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Cortea
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Iris.ai
- our overall score: 58/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 60/100 against 19/100
- headcount: 40 against 17
- LinkedIn following: 10,536 against 2,840
At a glance
| Measure | Cortea | Iris.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | The AI quality layer for audit firms. | AI knowledge foundation for regulated enterprises, turning complex data into AI you can trust. |
| Category | Fintech, Artificial Intelligence, Auditing, Professional Services | AI Foundation & Compute, Agentic AI, RAG, Foundation Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software | platform |
| Founded | 2024 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Berlin, Germany | Oslo, Norway |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cortea | Iris.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 17 | 40 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -25.9% |
| Total funding | $12.0M | $10.4M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,840 | 10,536 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cortea | Iris.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 19/100 | 60/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cortea | Iris.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Angular, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Plausible | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Cortea vs Iris.ai: common questions
Which is better, Cortea or Iris.ai?
On our 0-100 score Iris.ai rates higher (58/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cortea and Iris.ai compare on the numbers?
Iris.ai leads on our overall score (58/100 against 54/100), domain rating (60/100 against 19/100), headcount (40 against 17), LinkedIn following (10,536 against 2,840).
Read the full Cortea review and pricing or the Iris.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Cortea alternatives we track.