Cortea vs Gray Swan
Cortea vs Gray Swan, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cortea is on 54/100 and Gray Swan on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Cortea
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 39/100
Gray Swan
- our overall score: 63/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 64/100 against 19/100
- headcount: 81 against 17
- funding raised: $45.7M against $12.0M
- LinkedIn following: 7,116 against 2,840
At a glance
| Measure | Cortea | Gray Swan |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | The AI quality layer for audit firms. | Gray Swan provides enterprise-grade security solutions for LLMs, developed by the pioneers of AI vulnerability research, enabling confident AI deployment. |
| Category | Fintech, Artificial Intelligence, Auditing, Professional Services | Cybersecurity, AI Safety, AI Alignment, Large Language Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2024 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Berlin, Germany | Pittsburgh, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cortea | Gray Swan |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 17 | 81 |
| Total funding | $12.0M | $45.7M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| Valuation | Not published | $200M |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,840 | 7,116 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cortea | Gray Swan |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 72/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 19/100 | 64/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cortea | Gray Swan |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Plausible | PostHog |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Cortea | Gray Swan |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 5 positive, 0 negative across 5 threads |
“Gray Swan AI—where AI security meets the underground. This is the proving ground for red teamers, hackers, & AI skeptics pushing models to their limits. Jailbreak, exploit, & expose vulnerabilities in cutting-edge AI systems.”r/
Cortea vs Gray Swan: common questions
Which is better, Cortea or Gray Swan?
On our 0-100 score Gray Swan rates higher (63/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cortea and Gray Swan compare on the numbers?
Cortea leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 39/100). Gray Swan leads on our overall score (63/100 against 54/100), domain rating (64/100 against 19/100), headcount (81 against 17), funding raised ($45.7M against $12.0M), LinkedIn following (7,116 against 2,840).
What do real users say about Cortea and Gray Swan?
Gray Swan: 5 positive and 0 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full Cortea review and pricing or the Gray Swan review and pricing. You can also browse other Cortea alternatives we track.