Coro vs Perimeter 81
Coro vs Perimeter 81, compared side by side on 26 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Coro is on 65/100 and Perimeter 81 on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Coro
- headcount: 282 against 97
- headcount growth: +32.0% against -26.3%
- funding raised: $235M against $155M
Perimeter 81
- our overall score: 69/100 against 65/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 59/100
- LinkedIn following: 33,562 against 20,837
At a glance
| Measure | Coro | Perimeter 81 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Coro provides an all-in-one cybersecurity platform for mid-market organizations, defending against malware, ransomware, phishing, and other threats across devices, users, and cloud applications. | Converged networking and cybersecurity platform for secure remote and office access to all resources. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Malware, Data Leakage Prevention | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Network, Network Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Coro | Perimeter 81 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 282 | 97 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +32.0% | -26.3% |
| Total funding | $235M | $155M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series C |
| Valuation | $850M | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,837 | 33,562 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Coro | Perimeter 81 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Coro | Perimeter 81 |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Intercom, Freshdesk |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Coro vs Perimeter 81: common questions
Which is better, Coro or Perimeter 81?
On our 0-100 score Perimeter 81 rates higher (69/100 against 65/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 26 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Coro and Perimeter 81 compare on the numbers?
Coro leads on headcount (282 against 97), headcount growth (+32.0% against -26.3%), funding raised ($235M against $155M). Perimeter 81 leads on our overall score (69/100 against 65/100), domain rating (90/100 against 59/100), LinkedIn following (33,562 against 20,837).
Read the full Coro review and pricing or the Perimeter 81 review and pricing. You can also browse other Coro alternatives we track.