Coro vs Imperva
Coro vs Imperva, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Coro is on 65/100 and Imperva on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Coro
- funding raised: $235M against $75.7M
Imperva
- domain rating: 84/100 against 59/100
- headcount: 1,700 against 282
- LinkedIn following: 75,709 against 20,837
At a glance
| Measure | Coro | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Coro provides an all-in-one cybersecurity platform for mid-market organizations, defending against malware, ransomware, phishing, and other threats across devices, users, and cloud applications. | Imperva is a cybersecurity leader protecting critical applications, APIs, and data for organizations globally with an integrated security approach. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Malware, Data Leakage Prevention | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Application Security, Data Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | San Mateo, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Coro | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 282 | 1,700 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +32.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $235M | $75.7M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series B |
| Valuation | $850M | $10.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,837 | 75,709 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Coro | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 57/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 84/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Coro | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Coro vs Imperva: common questions
Which is better, Coro or Imperva?
On our 0-100 score Imperva rates higher (67/100 against 65/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Coro and Imperva compare on the numbers?
Coro leads on funding raised ($235M against $75.7M). Imperva leads on domain rating (84/100 against 59/100), headcount (1,700 against 282), LinkedIn following (75,709 against 20,837).
Read the full Coro review and pricing or the Imperva review and pricing. You can also browse other Coro alternatives we track.

