Corephotonics vs LinX Imaging

Corephotonics vs LinX Imaging, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Corephotonics is on 52/100 and LinX Imaging on 18/100.

Corephotonics logo
CorephotonicsPioneer and market leader in dual camera technologies for mobile devices, enhancing mobile photography with novel optics and computational photography.
Try Corephotonics
LinX ImagingA startup that developed multi-aperture camera technology for improved mobile device photography, later acquired by Apple.

Where each one leads

Corephotonics

  • our overall score: 52/100 against 18/100

LinX Imaging

Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.

At a glance

MeasureCorephotonicsLinX Imaging
What it isPioneer and market leader in dual camera technologies for mobile devices, enhancing mobile photography with novel optics and computational photography.A startup that developed multi-aperture camera technology for improved mobile device photography, later acquired by Apple.
CategoryCamera, Mobile, Dual Camera Technology, Mobile PhotographyCamera, 3D Imaging, Computer Vision, Computational Photography
Sells toBusiness modelB2BB2B
OfferingHardwareHardware
Founded20122009
HeadquartersTel Aviv, IsraelTel Aviv, Israel
StatusActiveActive

Size, funding and growth

MeasureCorephotonicsLinX Imaging
Employees70Not published
Total funding$38.0MNot published
Latest roundSeries CSeed
LinkedIn followers8,556Not published

StartupHub scores

Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.

MeasureCorephotonicsLinX Imaging
StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating52/10018/100
Traction56/100Not published
Team30/10060/100
Search visibility31/1009/100
Quality58/100Not published
Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the siteD (41/100)Not published
Domain ratingLink authority, 0-10031/100Not published

Technology

Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.

MeasureCorephotonicsLinX Imaging
HostingSelf ManagedNot detected
CMSWordPressNot detected
FrameworksJqueryNot detected
AnalyticsGoogle Analytics 4, SegmentNot detected

What users say

MeasureCorephotonicsLinX Imaging
Reddit sentimentThreads we track3 positive, 1 negative across 6 threadsNot published
Corephotonics
Samsung buys Israeli co Corephotonics for $155m.
r/Android

Corephotonics vs LinX Imaging: common questions

Which is better, Corephotonics or LinX Imaging?

On our 0-100 score Corephotonics rates higher (52/100 against 18/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.

How do Corephotonics and LinX Imaging compare on the numbers?

Corephotonics leads on our overall score (52/100 against 18/100).

What do real users say about Corephotonics and LinX Imaging?

Corephotonics: 3 positive and 1 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Android.

Read the full Corephotonics review and pricing or the LinX Imaging review and pricing. You can also browse other Corephotonics alternatives we track.