Corelight vs CYREBRO
Corelight vs CYREBRO, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Corelight is on 67/100 and CYREBRO on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Corelight
- our overall score: 67/100 against 61/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 37/100
- domain rating: 70/100 against 50/100
- headcount: 468 against 143
- funding raised: $284M against $66.0M
- LinkedIn following: 21,611 against 10,583
CYREBRO
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Corelight | CYREBRO |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open network detection and response platform for cybersecurity. | CYREBRO provides a managed detection and response (MDR) solution, offering a full-fledged Security Operations Center (SOC) to organizations. |
| Category | Network Security, Network Detection and Response (NDR), Cybersecurity, Security Operations | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Managed Detection and Response |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Corelight | CYREBRO |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 468 | 143 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -15.9% |
| Total funding | $284M | $66.0M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 21,611 | 10,583 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Corelight | CYREBRO |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 70/100 | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Corelight | CYREBRO |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Corelight vs CYREBRO: common questions
Which is better, Corelight or CYREBRO?
On our 0-100 score Corelight rates higher (67/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Corelight and CYREBRO compare on the numbers?
Corelight leads on our overall score (67/100 against 61/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 37/100), domain rating (70/100 against 50/100), headcount (468 against 143), funding raised ($284M against $66.0M), LinkedIn following (21,611 against 10,583).
Read the full Corelight review and pricing or the CYREBRO review and pricing. You can also browse other Corelight alternatives we track.