Corelight vs Cybereason
Corelight vs Cybereason, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Corelight is on 67/100 and Cybereason on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Corelight
- our overall score: 67/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 33/100
Cybereason
- headcount: 676 against 468
- funding raised: $934M against $284M
- LinkedIn following: 88,003 against 21,611
At a glance
| Measure | Corelight | Cybereason |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open network detection and response platform for cybersecurity. | Cybereason provides a comprehensive cybersecurity platform that prevents, detects, and responds to cyber attacks using AI-driven endpoint protection. |
| Category | Network Security, Network Detection and Response (NDR), Cybersecurity, Security Operations | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Incident Response, Forensics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Corelight | Cybereason |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 468 | 676 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -20.0% |
| Total funding | $284M | $934M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series H |
| Valuation | Not published | $350M |
| LinkedIn followers | 21,611 | 88,003 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Corelight | Cybereason |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 70/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Corelight | Cybereason |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Corelight | Cybereason |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 1 negative across 4 threads |
“I currently have Cybereason and I've had a good experience with them, but if I'm being honest my IT group is small and doesn't have a ton of time to manage A/V. Cybereason has been good in that we've had no major virus issues, but their int”r/cybersecurity
Corelight vs Cybereason: common questions
Which is better, Corelight or Cybereason?
On our 0-100 score Corelight rates higher (67/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Corelight and Cybereason compare on the numbers?
Corelight leads on our overall score (67/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 33/100). Cybereason leads on headcount (676 against 468), funding raised ($934M against $284M), LinkedIn following (88,003 against 21,611).
What do real users say about Corelight and Cybereason?
Cybereason: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/cybersecurity.
Read the full Corelight review and pricing or the Cybereason review and pricing. You can also browse other Corelight alternatives we track.