CoreAI vs Shibumi-ai
CoreAI vs Shibumi-ai, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CoreAI is on 27/100 and Shibumi-ai on 25/100.
Where each one leads
CoreAI
- our overall score: 27/100 against 25/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 32/100
- domain rating: 14/100 against 2/100
- headcount: 7 against 4
- LinkedIn following: 763 against 260
Shibumi-ai
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CoreAI | Shibumi-ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops mature AI models faster using its CoreControl Platform for various challenges. | Machine learning consulting firm specializing in analyzing business problems and formulating ML solutions. |
| Category | AI Enablers, Custom, Consulting, AI Infrastructure | AI Enablers, Custom, Consulting, MLOps |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Kiryat Ono, Israel | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CoreAI | Shibumi-ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 7 | 4 |
| Latest round | Bootstrapped | Bootstrapped |
| LinkedIn followers | 763 | 260 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CoreAI | Shibumi-ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 27/100 | 25/100 |
| Traction | 9/100 | 7/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 27/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (32/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 14/100 | 2/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CoreAI | Shibumi-ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | Wix | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
CoreAI vs Shibumi-ai: common questions
Which is better, CoreAI or Shibumi-ai?
On our 0-100 score CoreAI rates higher (27/100 against 25/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CoreAI and Shibumi-ai compare on the numbers?
CoreAI leads on our overall score (27/100 against 25/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 32/100), domain rating (14/100 against 2/100), headcount (7 against 4), LinkedIn following (763 against 260).
Read the full CoreAI review and pricing or the Shibumi-ai review and pricing. You can also browse other CoreAI alternatives we track.