Core Scientific vs Penguin Computing
Core Scientific vs Penguin Computing, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Core Scientific is on 39/100 and Penguin Computing on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Core Scientific
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Penguin Computing
- our overall score: 49/100 against 39/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 1,886 against 288
- LinkedIn following: 65,468 against 17,044
At a glance
| Measure | Core Scientific | Penguin Computing |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Leading provider of high-performance computing infrastructure for AI and blockchain. | High-performance computing solutions and services for demanding workloads. |
| Category | AI Infrastructure, High-Performance Computing, Data Center Services, Blockchain Infrastructure | High-Performance Computing, AI Infrastructure, Data Analytics, Supercomputing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Hardware | software | services | platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 1997 |
| Headquarters | Austin, United States | Newark, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Core Scientific | Penguin Computing |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 288 | 1,886 |
| Total funding | $2.0B | Not published |
| Latest round | Unknown | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 17,044 | 65,468 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Core Scientific | Penguin Computing |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 20/100 | 20/100 |
| Community | 14/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 35/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 67/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Core Scientific | Penguin Computing |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Zendesk | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Core Scientific vs Penguin Computing: common questions
Which is better, Core Scientific or Penguin Computing?
On our 0-100 score Penguin Computing rates higher (49/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Core Scientific and Penguin Computing compare on the numbers?
Penguin Computing leads on our overall score (49/100 against 39/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 41/100), headcount (1,886 against 288), LinkedIn following (65,468 against 17,044).
Read the full Core Scientific review and pricing or the Penguin Computing review and pricing. You can also browse other Core Scientific alternatives we track.