Core Scientific vs Firmus
Core Scientific vs Firmus, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Core Scientific is on 39/100 and Firmus on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Core Scientific
- domain rating: 67/100 against 25/100
- headcount: 288 against 200
- funding raised: $2.0B against $837M
- LinkedIn following: 17,044 against 1,253
Firmus
- our overall score: 58/100 against 39/100
At a glance
| Measure | Core Scientific | Firmus |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Leading provider of high-performance computing infrastructure for AI and blockchain. | Energy-efficient AI infrastructure cloud |
| Category | AI Infrastructure, High-Performance Computing, Data Center Services, Blockchain Infrastructure | Neocloud, AI Infrastructure, GPU, Cloud Computing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Austin, United States | Saint Leonards, Australia |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Core Scientific | Firmus |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 288 | 200 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +35.6% |
| Total funding | $2.0B | $837M |
| Latest round | Unknown | Funding Round |
| Valuation | Not published | $5.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 17,044 | 1,253 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Core Scientific | Firmus |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 20/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 14/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 35/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 67/100 | 25/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Core Scientific | Firmus |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Zendesk | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Core Scientific vs Firmus: common questions
Which is better, Core Scientific or Firmus?
On our 0-100 score Firmus rates higher (58/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Core Scientific and Firmus compare on the numbers?
Core Scientific leads on domain rating (67/100 against 25/100), headcount (288 against 200), funding raised ($2.0B against $837M), LinkedIn following (17,044 against 1,253). Firmus leads on our overall score (58/100 against 39/100).
Read the full Core Scientific review and pricing or the Firmus review and pricing. You can also browse other Core Scientific alternatives we track.