Corcentric vs Pivot Technologies
Corcentric vs Pivot Technologies, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Corcentric is on 63/100 and Pivot Technologies on 43/100.
Where each one leads
Corcentric
- our overall score: 63/100 against 43/100
- domain rating: 63/100 against 32/100
- funding raised: $395M against $40.0M
Pivot Technologies
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Corcentric | Pivot Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | B2B commerce solutions for AP, AR, procurement, and payments. | An AI operating system for procurement. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Procurement Software, Accounts Payable Automation | Procurement, Artificial Intelligence, Enterprise Software, Procurement Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 1996 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Cherry Hill, United States | San Francisco, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Corcentric | Pivot Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 577 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +2.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $395M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Credit Facility | Undisclosed |
| Valuation | $1.2B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 66,190 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Corcentric | Pivot Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 43/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 38/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 17/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 63/100 | 32/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Corcentric | Pivot Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Framer |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Corcentric vs Pivot Technologies: common questions
Which is better, Corcentric or Pivot Technologies?
On our 0-100 score Corcentric rates higher (63/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Corcentric and Pivot Technologies compare on the numbers?
Corcentric leads on our overall score (63/100 against 43/100), domain rating (63/100 against 32/100), funding raised ($395M against $40.0M).
Read the full Corcentric review and pricing or the Pivot Technologies review and pricing. You can also browse other Corcentric alternatives we track.