Corcentric vs GMAGIC
Corcentric vs GMAGIC, compared side by side on 9 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Corcentric is on 63/100 and GMAGIC on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Corcentric
- our overall score: 63/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 22/100
GMAGIC
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Corcentric | GMAGIC |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | B2B commerce solutions for AP, AR, procurement, and payments. | AI for intelligent document processing, specializing in Accounts Receivable automation. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Procurement Software, Accounts Payable Automation | Accounts Receivable, Accounts Receivable Automation, Intelligent Document Processing, Fintech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 1996 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Cherry Hill, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Corcentric | GMAGIC |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 577 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +2.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $395M | Not published |
| Latest round | Credit Facility | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.2B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 66,190 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Corcentric | GMAGIC |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 63/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Corcentric | GMAGIC |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Corcentric vs GMAGIC: common questions
Which is better, Corcentric or GMAGIC?
On our 0-100 score Corcentric rates higher (63/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 9 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Corcentric and GMAGIC compare on the numbers?
Corcentric leads on our overall score (63/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 22/100).
Read the full Corcentric review and pricing or the GMAGIC review and pricing. You can also browse other Corcentric alternatives we track.