Coohom vs Qbiq
Coohom vs Qbiq, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Coohom is on 53/100 and Qbiq on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Coohom
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 150 against 104
- LinkedIn following: 21,590 against 16,423
Qbiq
- our overall score: 59/100 against 53/100
At a glance
| Measure | Coohom | Qbiq |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered interior design and home furnishing visualization platform. | Qbiq accelerates real estate space planning from weeks to minutes using AI to generate 3D tours and architectural layouts. |
| Category | Interior Design Software, 3D Visualization, Home Furnishing, E-commerce | Proptech, Architecture, 3D, Augmented Reality (AR) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Shanghai, China | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Coohom | Qbiq |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 150 | 104 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +38.0% |
| Total funding | Not published | $26.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 21,590 | 16,423 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Coohom | Qbiq |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 48/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Coohom | Qbiq |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel |
Coohom vs Qbiq: common questions
Which is better, Coohom or Qbiq?
On our 0-100 score Qbiq rates higher (59/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Coohom and Qbiq compare on the numbers?
Coohom leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 39/100), domain rating (73/100 against 48/100), headcount (150 against 104), LinkedIn following (21,590 against 16,423). Qbiq leads on our overall score (59/100 against 53/100).
Read the full Coohom review and pricing or the Qbiq review and pricing. You can also browse other Coohom alternatives we track.