Convex vs Supabase
Convex vs Supabase, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Convex is on 43/100 and Supabase on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Convex
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Supabase
- our overall score: 70/100 against 43/100
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 43/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 78/100
- headcount: 342 against 41
- LinkedIn following: 99,093 against 5,734
At a glance
| Measure | Convex | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Real-time backend as a service with a reactive database, built in pure TypeScript. | Open source Firebase alternative with a PostgreSQL backend and real-time capabilities. |
| Category | Backend as a Service, Developer Tools, Real-time Data, Database | Database, Backend as a Service, Developer Tools, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Convex | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 41 | 342 |
| Total funding | Not published | $933M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $11B |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,734 | 99,093 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Convex | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 43/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 16/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 72/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 75/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | C (66/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Convex | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Convex vs Supabase: common questions
Which is better, Convex or Supabase?
On our 0-100 score Supabase rates higher (70/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Convex and Supabase compare on the numbers?
Supabase leads on our overall score (70/100 against 43/100), agent readiness (66/100 against 43/100), domain rating (91/100 against 78/100), headcount (342 against 41), LinkedIn following (99,093 against 5,734).
Read the full Convex review and pricing or the Supabase review and pricing. You can also browse other Convex alternatives we track.