Convex vs ScyllaDB
Convex vs ScyllaDB, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Convex is on 43/100 and ScyllaDB on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Convex
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
ScyllaDB
- our overall score: 67/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 225 against 41
- LinkedIn following: 28,743 against 5,734
At a glance
| Measure | Convex | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Real-time backend as a service with a reactive database, built in pure TypeScript. | ScyllaDB is a high-performance, low-latency NoSQL database for data-intensive applications, designed to scale with modern infrastructure. |
| Category | Backend as a Service, Developer Tools, Real-time Data, Database | Database, Enterprise, NoSQL, NoSQL Database |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Convex | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 41 | 225 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +13.6% |
| Total funding | Not published | $101M |
| Latest round | Not published | Debt |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,734 | 28,743 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Convex | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 43/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 16/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Convex | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Self Managed |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Convex | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads |
“My custom RDBMS is 588,235x faster than ScyllaDB on my laptop with fsync on executing a complex HTAP query.”r/Database
Convex vs ScyllaDB: common questions
Which is better, Convex or ScyllaDB?
On our 0-100 score ScyllaDB rates higher (67/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Convex and ScyllaDB compare on the numbers?
ScyllaDB leads on our overall score (67/100 against 43/100), headcount (225 against 41), LinkedIn following (28,743 against 5,734).
What do real users say about Convex and ScyllaDB?
ScyllaDB: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Database.
Read the full Convex review and pricing or the ScyllaDB review and pricing. You can also browse other Convex alternatives we track.