ControlMonkey vs Puppet
ControlMonkey vs Puppet, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ControlMonkey is on 50/100 and Puppet on 60/100.
Where each one leads
ControlMonkey
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Puppet
- our overall score: 60/100 against 50/100
- domain rating: 82/100 against 59/100
- headcount: 184 against 24
- funding raised: $121M against $7.0M
- LinkedIn following: 60,516 against 9,873
At a glance
| Measure | ControlMonkey | Puppet |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for end-to-end automation and control of cloud infrastructure. | Infrastructure automation and operations platform for managing and securing IT infrastructure at scale. |
| Category | Infrastructure as Code, Cloud Infrastructure, DevOps, CI/CD | Infrastructure as Code, Configuration Management, IT Automation, DevOps |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Portland, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ControlMonkey | Puppet |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 24 | 184 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -14.0% |
| Total funding | $7.0M | $121M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series F |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,873 | 60,516 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ControlMonkey | Puppet |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 45/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 82/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ControlMonkey | Puppet |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
ControlMonkey vs Puppet: common questions
Which is better, ControlMonkey or Puppet?
On our 0-100 score Puppet rates higher (60/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ControlMonkey and Puppet compare on the numbers?
Puppet leads on our overall score (60/100 against 50/100), domain rating (82/100 against 59/100), headcount (184 against 24), funding raised ($121M against $7.0M), LinkedIn following (60,516 against 9,873).
Read the full ControlMonkey review and pricing or the Puppet review and pricing. You can also browse other ControlMonkey alternatives we track.