Contino vs Serebro Technologies
Contino vs Serebro Technologies, compared side by side on 10 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Contino is on 61/100 and Serebro Technologies on 1/100.
Where each one leads
Contino
- our overall score: 61/100 against 1/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 65/100 against 2/100
Serebro Technologies
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Contino | Serebro Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global DevOps and cloud transformation consultancy acquired by Cognizant. | Serebro builds sovereign, air-gapped AI infrastructure and automated digital systems for high-performance businesses under 100 employees. |
| Category | Enterprise Software, Cloud Infrastructure, DevOps, Cloud Transformation | Enterprise Software, AI Agent, Agentic AI, AI Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | Not published |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Contino | Serebro Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 204 | Not published |
| Total funding | $40.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 30,117 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Contino | Serebro Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 1/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 65/100 | 2/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Contino | Serebro Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Not detected |
| CDN | Netlify | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Gatsby | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Contino vs Serebro Technologies: common questions
Which is better, Contino or Serebro Technologies?
On our 0-100 score Contino rates higher (61/100 against 1/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 10 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Contino and Serebro Technologies compare on the numbers?
Contino leads on our overall score (61/100 against 1/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 21/100), domain rating (65/100 against 2/100).
Read the full Contino review and pricing or the Serebro Technologies review and pricing. You can also browse other Contino alternatives we track.