Consumer Physics vs SupPlant
Consumer Physics vs SupPlant, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Consumer Physics is on 57/100 and SupPlant on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Consumer Physics
- domain rating: 51/100 against 38/100
SupPlant
- our overall score: 66/100 against 57/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 35/100
- headcount growth: -13.4% against -61.5%
- funding raised: $62.9M against $39.1M
- LinkedIn following: 15,340 against 10,839
At a glance
| Measure | Consumer Physics | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | SCiO develops pocket-sized connected micro-spectrometers to empower agriculture and food industries with real-time material analysis. | Agritech company providing AI-driven irrigation solutions for water-stressed agriculture, optimizing crop yields and conserving water. |
| Category | Spectrometry, Agritech, IoT, AgTech | AgTech, Precision Agriculture, Water Management, Crop Optimization |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Platform |
| Founded | 2011 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Afula, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Consumer Physics | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 49 | 55 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -61.5% | -13.4% |
| Total funding | $39.1M | $62.9M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $30.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,839 | 15,340 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Consumer Physics | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 75/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 51/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Consumer Physics | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, PostHog | Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | Consumer Physics | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 0 negative across 3 threads | Not published |
“Consumer Physics wants to put a molecular analyzer in your pocket.”r/Physics
Consumer Physics vs SupPlant: common questions
Which is better, Consumer Physics or SupPlant?
On our 0-100 score SupPlant rates higher (66/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Consumer Physics and SupPlant compare on the numbers?
Consumer Physics leads on domain rating (51/100 against 38/100). SupPlant leads on our overall score (66/100 against 57/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 35/100), headcount growth (-13.4% against -61.5%), funding raised ($62.9M against $39.1M), LinkedIn following (15,340 against 10,839).
What do real users say about Consumer Physics and SupPlant?
Consumer Physics: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Physics.
Read the full Consumer Physics review and pricing or the SupPlant review and pricing. You can also browse other Consumer Physics alternatives we track.