construction.live vs PlanRadar
construction.live vs PlanRadar, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: construction.live is on 40/100 and PlanRadar on 60/100.
Where each one leads
construction.live
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
PlanRadar
- our overall score: 60/100 against 40/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 34/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 13/100
- funding raised: $100M against $1.0M
At a glance
| Measure | construction.live | PlanRadar |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for construction professionals to streamline preconstruction, estimating, bidding, and project intelligence. | Digital platform for construction and real estate project management. |
| Category | Construction Tech, Project Management, Estimating Software, Bidding Software | Construction Tech, Real Estate Tech, Proptech, Vertical SaaS |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Vienna, Austria |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | construction.live | PlanRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 428 |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $100M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 41,926 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | construction.live | PlanRadar |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 5/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (34/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 13/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | construction.live | PlanRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | construction.live | PlanRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads |
“Vienna has produced unicorns and scaleups like Bitpanda, GoStudent, Tricentis, waterdrop®, Storebox • Urban Logistics, refurbed, NEOH & PlanRadar A But the next wave is already being built.”r/StartupDACH
construction.live vs PlanRadar: common questions
Which is better, construction.live or PlanRadar?
On our 0-100 score PlanRadar rates higher (60/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do construction.live and PlanRadar compare on the numbers?
PlanRadar leads on our overall score (60/100 against 40/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 34/100), domain rating (71/100 against 13/100), funding raised ($100M against $1.0M).
What do real users say about construction.live and PlanRadar?
PlanRadar: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/StartupDACH.
Read the full construction.live review and pricing or the PlanRadar review and pricing. You can also browse other construction.live alternatives we track.