construction.live vs Fieldlens
construction.live vs Fieldlens, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: construction.live is on 40/100 and Fieldlens on 59/100.
Where each one leads
construction.live
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Fieldlens
- our overall score: 59/100 against 40/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 34/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 13/100
- funding raised: $17.7M against $1.0M
At a glance
| Measure | construction.live | Fieldlens |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for construction professionals to streamline preconstruction, estimating, bidding, and project intelligence. | Real-time jobsite collaboration software connecting field and office teams in construction. |
| Category | Construction Tech, Project Management, Estimating Software, Bidding Software | Construction Tech, Vertical SaaS, Project Management, Collaboration Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tampa, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | construction.live | Fieldlens |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 99 |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $17.7M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 8,652 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | construction.live | Fieldlens |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 40/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 30/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 5/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (34/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 13/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | construction.live | Fieldlens |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | construction.live | Fieldlens |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 3 threads |
“WeWork has acquired 21 startups in the last four years, from a college messaging service to a real estate investing app. Here's everything WeWork has bought.. Spacious SpaceIQ Waltz Prolific Interactive Islands Media Managed by Q Euclid Ana”r/buzzfeedbot
construction.live vs Fieldlens: common questions
Which is better, construction.live or Fieldlens?
On our 0-100 score Fieldlens rates higher (59/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do construction.live and Fieldlens compare on the numbers?
Fieldlens leads on our overall score (59/100 against 40/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 34/100), domain rating (55/100 against 13/100), funding raised ($17.7M against $1.0M).
What do real users say about construction.live and Fieldlens?
Fieldlens: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/buzzfeedbot.
Read the full construction.live review and pricing or the Fieldlens review and pricing. You can also browse other construction.live alternatives we track.