Constant Contact vs Thrive Holdings
Constant Contact vs Thrive Holdings, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Constant Contact is on 52/100 and Thrive Holdings on 33/100.
Where each one leads
Constant Contact
- our overall score: 52/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 92/100 against 55/100
Thrive Holdings
- funding raised: $2.5B against $37.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Constant Contact | Thrive Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Digital marketing platform for small businesses and nonprofits, offering email, SMS, social media, and CRM tools. | A holding company focused on acquiring and growing businesses in the digital marketing and e-commerce sectors. |
| Category | Digital Marketing, Email Marketing, Marketing Automation, CRM | Digital Marketing, E-commerce, Holding Company, Private Equity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 1995 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Waltham, United States | Austin, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Constant Contact | Thrive Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,149 | Not published |
| Total funding | $37.0M | $2.5B |
| Latest round | Post IPO | Funding Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 44,549 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Constant Contact | Thrive Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 33/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 10/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 14/100 |
| Search visibility | 45/100 | 18/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 35/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 92/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Constant Contact | Thrive Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
Constant Contact vs Thrive Holdings: common questions
Which is better, Constant Contact or Thrive Holdings?
On our 0-100 score Constant Contact rates higher (52/100 against 33/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Constant Contact and Thrive Holdings compare on the numbers?
Constant Contact leads on our overall score (52/100 against 33/100), domain rating (92/100 against 55/100). Thrive Holdings leads on funding raised ($2.5B against $37.0M).
Read the full Constant Contact review and pricing or the Thrive Holdings review and pricing. You can also browse other Constant Contact alternatives we track.