ConsenSys vs ENS (Ethereum Name Service)
ConsenSys vs ENS (Ethereum Name Service), compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ConsenSys is on 30/100 and ENS (Ethereum Name Service) on 53/100.
Where each one leads
ConsenSys
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 26/100
- funding raised: $715M against $1.0M
ENS (Ethereum Name Service)
- our overall score: 53/100 against 30/100
At a glance
| Measure | ConsenSys | ENS (Ethereum Name Service) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ConsenSys is a leading blockchain software company building decentralized applications and developer tools for the Ethereum ecosystem. | Decentralized naming system for the Ethereum blockchain, mapping human-readable names to Ethereum addresses and Web3 resources. |
| Category | Web3, Blockchain, Ethereum, Decentralized Applications | Web3, Blockchain, DeFi, Identity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Brooklyn, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ConsenSys | ENS (Ethereum Name Service) |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | $715M | $1.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Grant |
| Valuation | $7 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ConsenSys | ENS (Ethereum Name Service) |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 30/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 30/100 |
| Team | 20/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 3/100 | 2/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (58/100) | F (26/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ConsenSys | ENS (Ethereum Name Service) |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Sveltekit, Svelte, Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Plausible |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Crypto Payments | Crypto Payments |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | ConsenSys | ENS (Ethereum Name Service) |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 3 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“What to make of Consensys planning to IPO?. Drop your thoughts and reason why you think its good or bad for SBET View Poll”r/SBETInvestors
ConsenSys vs ENS (Ethereum Name Service): common questions
Which is better, ConsenSys or ENS (Ethereum Name Service)?
On our 0-100 score ENS (Ethereum Name Service) rates higher (53/100 against 30/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ConsenSys and ENS (Ethereum Name Service) compare on the numbers?
ConsenSys leads on agent readiness (58/100 against 26/100), funding raised ($715M against $1.0M). ENS (Ethereum Name Service) leads on our overall score (53/100 against 30/100).
What do real users say about ConsenSys and ENS (Ethereum Name Service)?
ConsenSys: 0 positive and 3 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/SBETInvestors.
Read the full ConsenSys review and pricing or the ENS (Ethereum Name Service) review and pricing. You can also browse other ConsenSys alternatives we track.