ConsenSys (Infura) vs QuickNode
ConsenSys (Infura) vs QuickNode, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ConsenSys (Infura) is on 52/100 and QuickNode on 62/100.
Where each one leads
ConsenSys (Infura)
- funding raised: $221M against $95.0M
QuickNode
- our overall score: 62/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 77/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 122 against 15
At a glance
| Measure | ConsenSys (Infura) | QuickNode |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Infura provides developers with access to Ethereum and other blockchain networks. | Blockchain infrastructure provider offering high-performance RPC nodes and developer tools for Web3 applications. |
| Category | Web3, Blockchain, DeFi, API Platform | Blockchain, Web3, SaaS, Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Miami, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ConsenSys (Infura) | QuickNode |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 15 | 122 |
| Total funding | $221M | $95.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $800M |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,676 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ConsenSys (Infura) | QuickNode |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 13/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | B (77/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ConsenSys (Infura) | QuickNode |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Payments | Not detected | Stripe |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Segment |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot, Discourse |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Crypto Payments | X402 |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
ConsenSys (Infura) vs QuickNode: common questions
Which is better, ConsenSys (Infura) or QuickNode?
On our 0-100 score QuickNode rates higher (62/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ConsenSys (Infura) and QuickNode compare on the numbers?
ConsenSys (Infura) leads on funding raised ($221M against $95.0M). QuickNode leads on our overall score (62/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (77/100 against 37/100), headcount (122 against 15).
Read the full ConsenSys (Infura) review and pricing or the QuickNode review and pricing. You can also browse other ConsenSys (Infura) alternatives we track.