Connecting Threads vs Gymshark
Connecting Threads vs Gymshark, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Connecting Threads is on 7/100 and Gymshark on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Connecting Threads
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Gymshark
- our overall score: 66/100 against 7/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 24/100
- domain rating: 79/100 against 55/100
At a glance
| Measure | Connecting Threads | Gymshark |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Online retailer specializing in exclusive quilting fabric, thread, kits, patterns, and supplies. | Global fitness apparel and accessories brand known for its strong social media presence and community focus. |
| Category | Textile Art, Design Community, Creative Platform, Artist Resources | Retail, Fitness Apparel, Athleisure, E-commerce |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | E-commerce |
| Founded | 2008 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Vancouver, Canada | Solihull, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Connecting Threads | Gymshark |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 2,500 |
| Total funding | Not published | $261M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 401,437 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Connecting Threads | Gymshark |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 7/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 3/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (24/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 79/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Connecting Threads | Gymshark |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Shopify |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Fathom | Not detected |
Connecting Threads vs Gymshark: common questions
Which is better, Connecting Threads or Gymshark?
On our 0-100 score Gymshark rates higher (66/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Connecting Threads and Gymshark compare on the numbers?
Gymshark leads on our overall score (66/100 against 7/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 24/100), domain rating (79/100 against 55/100).
Read the full Connecting Threads review and pricing or the Gymshark review and pricing. You can also browse other Connecting Threads alternatives we track.