Connected Insurance vs Planck
Connected Insurance vs Planck, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Connected Insurance is on 46/100 and Planck on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Connected Insurance
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Planck
- our overall score: 65/100 against 46/100
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 45/100 against 20/100
- headcount: 75 against 7
- headcount growth: -7.5% against -22.9%
- LinkedIn following: 6,433 against 873
At a glance
| Measure | Connected Insurance | Planck |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Embeds bespoke, data-driven insurance into business offerings to create new revenue and customer value. | Commercial insurance data platform enabling instant and accurate business underwriting. |
| Category | Fintech, Insurance, InsurTech, Embedded Finance | Fintech, Insurance, Underwriting, InsurTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Connected Insurance | Planck |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 7 | 75 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -22.9% | -7.5% |
| Total funding | Not published | $71.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $250M |
| LinkedIn followers | 873 | 6,433 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Connected Insurance | Planck |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 9/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 20/100 | 45/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Connected Insurance | Planck |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Connected Insurance vs Planck: common questions
Which is better, Connected Insurance or Planck?
On our 0-100 score Planck rates higher (65/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Connected Insurance and Planck compare on the numbers?
Planck leads on our overall score (65/100 against 46/100), agent readiness (44/100 against 22/100), domain rating (45/100 against 20/100), headcount (75 against 7), headcount growth (-7.5% against -22.9%), LinkedIn following (6,433 against 873).
Read the full Connected Insurance review and pricing or the Planck review and pricing. You can also browse other Connected Insurance alternatives we track.