Connecteam vs Juno Journey
Connecteam vs Juno Journey, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Connecteam is on 62/100 and Juno Journey on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Connecteam
- our overall score: 62/100 against 57/100
- agent readiness: 35/100 against 27/100
- domain rating: 77/100 against 35/100
- headcount: 523 against 57
- headcount growth: +22.7% against +8.0%
- funding raised: $159M against $22.5M
- LinkedIn following: 26,391 against 11,003
Juno Journey
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Connecteam | Juno Journey |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | All-in-one employee management app for deskless and frontline workers. | Personalized employee development platform for onboarding, growth, and retention. |
| Category | Enterprise, Employee Management, App, Operations | Enterprise, HR, Employee Management, HR Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Connecteam | Juno Journey |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 523 | 57 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +22.7% | +8.0% |
| Total funding | $159M | $22.5M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A |
| Valuation | $800M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 26,391 | 11,003 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Connecteam | Juno Journey |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 44/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | F (27/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 35/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Connecteam | Juno Journey |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | Crisp, HubSpot |
Connecteam vs Juno Journey: common questions
Which is better, Connecteam or Juno Journey?
On our 0-100 score Connecteam rates higher (62/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Connecteam and Juno Journey compare on the numbers?
Connecteam leads on our overall score (62/100 against 57/100), agent readiness (35/100 against 27/100), domain rating (77/100 against 35/100), headcount (523 against 57), headcount growth (+22.7% against +8.0%), funding raised ($159M against $22.5M), LinkedIn following (26,391 against 11,003).
Read the full Connecteam review and pricing or the Juno Journey review and pricing. You can also browse other Connecteam alternatives we track.