Conduit vs Integromat (Make)
Conduit vs Integromat (Make), compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Conduit is on 43/100 and Integromat (Make) on 75/100.
Where each one leads
Conduit
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 46/100
Integromat (Make)
- our overall score: 75/100 against 43/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 50/100
- headcount: 709 against 29
- funding raised: $100M against $36.4M
- LinkedIn following: 109,922 against 3,428
At a glance
| Measure | Conduit | Integromat (Make) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for building and deploying custom AI agents for businesses. | Visual platform for automating workflows and integrating applications without code. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Foundation Model, Generative AI | Workflow Automation, Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), No Code, Low Code |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Prague, Czechia |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Conduit | Integromat (Make) |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 29 | 709 |
| Total funding | $36.4M | $100M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,428 | 109,922 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Conduit | Integromat (Make) |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 43/100 | 75/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | Not published |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 35/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 50/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Conduit | Integromat (Make) |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
Conduit vs Integromat (Make): common questions
Which is better, Conduit or Integromat (Make)?
On our 0-100 score Integromat (Make) rates higher (75/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Conduit and Integromat (Make) compare on the numbers?
Conduit leads on agent readiness (52/100 against 46/100). Integromat (Make) leads on our overall score (75/100 against 43/100), domain rating (90/100 against 50/100), headcount (709 against 29), funding raised ($100M against $36.4M), LinkedIn following (109,922 against 3,428).
Read the full Conduit review and pricing or the Integromat (Make) review and pricing. You can also browse other Conduit alternatives we track.