Conduct vs Zapier
Conduct vs Zapier, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Conduct is on 41/100 and Zapier on 77/100.
Where each one leads
Conduct
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Zapier
- our overall score: 77/100 against 41/100
- agent readiness: 71/100 against 43/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 36/100
- headcount: 1,447 against 35
- funding raised: $1.3B against $78.1M
- LinkedIn following: 360,432 against 4,946
At a glance
| Measure | Conduct | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Conduct lets IT teams understand, modernise, and run their enterprise systems with AI - fast and with confidence. Starting with SAP. Extending to the entire enterprise stack. | Zapier automates workflows by connecting web applications, enabling users to move data and automate tasks without coding. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Workflow Automation, Customer Service Automation | Workflow Automation, Application Integration, Low-Code Development, No-Code Development |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Conduct | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 35 | 1,447 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +17.9% |
| Total funding | $78.1M | $1.3B |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $5.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,946 | 360,432 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Conduct | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 41/100 | 77/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 14/100 | 20/100 |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 66/100 |
| Quality | 35/100 | 87/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | B (71/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 36/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Conduct | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | Framer | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
What users say
| Measure | Conduct | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 5.0/5 from 1 vote |
Conduct vs Zapier: common questions
Which is better, Conduct or Zapier?
On our 0-100 score Zapier rates higher (77/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Conduct and Zapier compare on the numbers?
Zapier leads on our overall score (77/100 against 41/100), agent readiness (71/100 against 43/100), domain rating (91/100 against 36/100), headcount (1,447 against 35), funding raised ($1.3B against $78.1M), LinkedIn following (360,432 against 4,946).
Read the full Conduct review and pricing or the Zapier review and pricing. You can also browse other Conduct alternatives we track.