Conduct vs Kore.ai
Conduct vs Kore.ai, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Conduct is on 41/100 and Kore.ai on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Conduct
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Kore.ai
- our overall score: 59/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 36/100
- headcount: 1,275 against 35
- funding raised: $150M against $78.1M
- LinkedIn following: 103,768 against 4,946
At a glance
| Measure | Conduct | Kore.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Conduct lets IT teams understand, modernise, and run their enterprise systems with AI - fast and with confidence. Starting with SAP. Extending to the entire enterprise stack. | Enterprise AI platform enabling businesses to build and deploy AI agents for automation and service. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Workflow Automation, Customer Service Automation | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Conversational AI, Voice AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Orlando, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Conduct | Kore.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 35 | 1,275 |
| Total funding | $78.1M | $150M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $1K |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,946 | 103,768 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Conduct | Kore.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 41/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | 14/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 35/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 36/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Conduct | Kore.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Framer | Webflow |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Conduct | Kore.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | AI for Work, AI for Service, AI for Process, Multi-Agent Orchestration, No-code & Pro-Code Tools, AI Safety, Security, Compliance & Governance |
Conduct vs Kore.ai: common questions
Which is better, Conduct or Kore.ai?
On our 0-100 score Kore.ai rates higher (59/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Conduct and Kore.ai compare on the numbers?
Kore.ai leads on our overall score (59/100 against 41/100), domain rating (74/100 against 36/100), headcount (1,275 against 35), funding raised ($150M against $78.1M), LinkedIn following (103,768 against 4,946).
Read the full Conduct review and pricing or the Kore.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Conduct alternatives we track.