Como vs Hippo Video
Como vs Hippo Video, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Como is on 60/100 and Hippo Video on 34/100.
Where each one leads
Como
- our overall score: 60/100 against 34/100
- headcount: 175 against 69
- LinkedIn following: 37,551 against 8,700
Hippo Video
- agent readiness: 43/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | Como | Hippo Video |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Como Sense provides a customer engagement and loyalty platform for businesses to personalize offers and drive sales. | AI-powered video creation and engagement platform for sales and marketing. |
| Category | Customer Engagement, Mobile, Enterprise, Customer Loyalty | Video Marketing, Sales Enablement, MarTech, Generative AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2005 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Como | Hippo Video |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 175 | 69 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +7.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $261M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.3B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 37,551 | 8,700 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Como | Hippo Video |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 34/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 18/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 68/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Como | Hippo Video |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Drift | HubSpot |
Como vs Hippo Video: common questions
Which is better, Como or Hippo Video?
On our 0-100 score Como rates higher (60/100 against 34/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Como and Hippo Video compare on the numbers?
Como leads on our overall score (60/100 against 34/100), headcount (175 against 69), LinkedIn following (37,551 against 8,700). Hippo Video leads on agent readiness (43/100 against 21/100).
Read the full Como review and pricing or the Hippo Video review and pricing. You can also browse other Como alternatives we track.