Colabo vs Evo.do
Colabo vs Evo.do, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Colabo is on 55/100 and Evo.do on 12/100.
Where each one leads
Colabo
- our overall score: 55/100 against 12/100
- headcount: 10 against 1
- LinkedIn following: 1,000 against 28
Evo.do
- agent readiness: 43/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 28/100 against 12/100
- headcount growth: -14.4% against -21.0%
At a glance
| Measure | Colabo | Evo.do |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Colabo provides an AI-powered no-code platform for organizations to create new conversational channels for digital optimization. | Evo.do is a reputation management platform for businesses, focusing on Google Maps, Yandex Maps, and 2GIS. |
| Category | Enterprise, Sales, Conversational AI, No Code | Enterprise, Development, AI Testing, MLOps |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2010 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Inactive | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Colabo | Evo.do |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 10 | 1 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -21.0% | -14.4% |
| Total funding | $10.5M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,000 | 28 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Colabo | Evo.do |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 12/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 3/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 14/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 12/100 | 28/100 |
Colabo vs Evo.do: common questions
Which is better, Colabo or Evo.do?
On our 0-100 score Colabo rates higher (55/100 against 12/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Colabo and Evo.do compare on the numbers?
Colabo leads on our overall score (55/100 against 12/100), headcount (10 against 1), LinkedIn following (1,000 against 28). Evo.do leads on agent readiness (43/100 against 21/100), domain rating (28/100 against 12/100), headcount growth (-14.4% against -21.0%).
Read the full Colabo review and pricing or the Evo.do review and pricing. You can also browse other Colabo alternatives we track.