Cohu vs Teradyne
Cohu vs Teradyne, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cohu is on Not scored yet and Teradyne on 30/100.
Where each one leads
Cohu
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Teradyne
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 32/100
- domain rating: 69/100 against 52/100
- headcount: 6,092 against 2,074
- LinkedIn following: 92,868 against 24,200
At a glance
| Measure | Cohu | Teradyne |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global technology leader providing test, automation, inspection, and metrology for the semiconductor industry. | Designs, develops, and manufactures automated test equipment and advanced robotics systems. |
| Category | Semiconductor Manufacturing, Semiconductor Testing, Automation, Inspection | Semiconductor Test Equipment, Robotics, Industrial Automation, Manufacturing Technology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | software | services | platform | Software | hardware | services | platform |
| Founded | 1947 | 1960 |
| Headquarters | Poway, United States | North Reading, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cohu | Teradyne |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,074 | 6,092 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -0.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $25B |
| Latest round | Not published | Public |
| Valuation | Not published | $28B |
| LinkedIn followers | 24,200 | 92,868 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cohu | Teradyne |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | Not published | 30/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 33/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 10/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 52/100 | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cohu | Teradyne |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Cohu vs Teradyne: common questions
Which is better, Cohu or Teradyne?
On our 0-100 score Teradyne rates higher (30/100 against Not scored yet). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cohu and Teradyne compare on the numbers?
Teradyne leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 32/100), domain rating (69/100 against 52/100), headcount (6,092 against 2,074), LinkedIn following (92,868 against 24,200).
Read the full Cohu review and pricing or the Teradyne review and pricing. You can also browse other Cohu alternatives we track.