Cohesive vs Lightricks
Cohesive vs Lightricks, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cohesive is on 10/100 and Lightricks on 71/100.
Where each one leads
Cohesive
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Lightricks
- our overall score: 71/100 against 10/100
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 38/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 46/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cohesive | Lightricks |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for creating diverse content formats and use cases. | Jerusalem-based AI creative technology company behind Facetune, Photoleap, and Videoleap, with open-source video generation models (LTX Video) powering next-generation creator workflows. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Content Creation, Writing Assistance, AI Content Creation | Artificial Intelligence, Creative Technology, Generative AI, AI Video Generation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B SaaS | B2C |
| Offering | SaaS | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Jerusalem, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cohesive | Lightricks |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 554 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -0.2% |
| Total funding | Not published | $335M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.8B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 33,563 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cohesive | Lightricks |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 10/100 | 71/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 51/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 46/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cohesive | Lightricks |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
Cohesive vs Lightricks: common questions
Which is better, Cohesive or Lightricks?
On our 0-100 score Lightricks rates higher (71/100 against 10/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cohesive and Lightricks compare on the numbers?
Lightricks leads on our overall score (71/100 against 10/100), agent readiness (44/100 against 38/100), domain rating (72/100 against 46/100).
Read the full Cohesive review and pricing or the Lightricks review and pricing. You can also browse other Cohesive alternatives we track.