CoGo vs Xpansiv
CoGo vs Xpansiv, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CoGo is on 51/100 and Xpansiv on 57/100.
Where each one leads
CoGo
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Xpansiv
- our overall score: 57/100 against 51/100
- domain rating: 68/100 against 54/100
- headcount: 250 against 55
- funding raised: $100M against $1.8M
- LinkedIn following: 16,059 against 10,966
At a glance
| Measure | CoGo | Xpansiv |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Platform for home and vehicle electrification, offering personalized recommendations and supplier connections. | Global commodity data and analytics platform for ESG and energy markets. |
| Category | Climate Tech, Energy, EV Charging, Solar Energy | Climate Tech, Energy, Commodity Data, ESG |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2010 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CoGo | Xpansiv |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 55 | 250 |
| Total funding | $1.8M | $100M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,966 | 16,059 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CoGo | Xpansiv |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 54/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CoGo | Xpansiv |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
CoGo vs Xpansiv: common questions
Which is better, CoGo or Xpansiv?
On our 0-100 score Xpansiv rates higher (57/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CoGo and Xpansiv compare on the numbers?
Xpansiv leads on our overall score (57/100 against 51/100), domain rating (68/100 against 54/100), headcount (250 against 55), funding raised ($100M against $1.8M), LinkedIn following (16,059 against 10,966).
Read the full CoGo review and pricing or the Xpansiv review and pricing. You can also browse other CoGo alternatives we track.