CoGo vs Soiling
CoGo vs Soiling, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CoGo is on 51/100 and Soiling on 38/100.
Where each one leads
CoGo
- our overall score: 51/100 against 38/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 29/100
- domain rating: 54/100 against 6/100
- headcount: 55 against 9
- LinkedIn following: 10,966 against 1,335
Soiling
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CoGo | Soiling |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Platform for home and vehicle electrification, offering personalized recommendations and supplier connections. | Data-driven solution for profit-maximizing mitigation of solar panel soiling. |
| Category | Climate Tech, Energy, EV Charging, Solar Energy | Climate Tech, Solar Energy, Energy Storage, AI-Driven Grid Balancing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | platform | Software |
| Founded | 2010 | Not published |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CoGo | Soiling |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 55 | 9 |
| Total funding | $1.8M | $1.5M |
| Latest round | Seed | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,966 | 1,335 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CoGo | Soiling |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 38/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 41/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (29/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 54/100 | 6/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CoGo | Soiling |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
CoGo vs Soiling: common questions
Which is better, CoGo or Soiling?
On our 0-100 score CoGo rates higher (51/100 against 38/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CoGo and Soiling compare on the numbers?
CoGo leads on our overall score (51/100 against 38/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 29/100), domain rating (54/100 against 6/100), headcount (55 against 9), LinkedIn following (10,966 against 1,335).
Read the full CoGo review and pricing or the Soiling review and pricing. You can also browse other CoGo alternatives we track.