Cogntiv Neurosystems vs Inner Cosmos
Cogntiv Neurosystems vs Inner Cosmos, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cogntiv Neurosystems is on 37/100 and Inner Cosmos on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Cogntiv Neurosystems
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Inner Cosmos
- our overall score: 54/100 against 37/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 20/100
- headcount: 15 against 2
At a glance
| Measure | Cogntiv Neurosystems | Inner Cosmos |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing advanced neurotechnology for understanding and enhancing cognitive function. | Developing a digital pill to rebalance brain networks using imperceptible micro-stimulations. |
| Category | Neuroscience, Healthcare, Neurotech & HCI, Cognitive Enhancement Wearables | Healthcare, Brain, Sensor, Human Machine Interface |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cogntiv Neurosystems | Inner Cosmos |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | 15 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +2.1% |
| Total funding | Not published | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 1,815 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cogntiv Neurosystems | Inner Cosmos |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 37/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 5/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (20/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 26/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cogntiv Neurosystems | Inner Cosmos |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Hetzner |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Hotjar |
Cogntiv Neurosystems vs Inner Cosmos: common questions
Which is better, Cogntiv Neurosystems or Inner Cosmos?
On our 0-100 score Inner Cosmos rates higher (54/100 against 37/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cogntiv Neurosystems and Inner Cosmos compare on the numbers?
Inner Cosmos leads on our overall score (54/100 against 37/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 20/100), headcount (15 against 2).
Read the full Cogntiv Neurosystems review and pricing or the Inner Cosmos review and pricing. You can also browse other Cogntiv Neurosystems alternatives we track.