CognitiveID vs Imperva
CognitiveID vs Imperva, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CognitiveID is on 41/100 and Imperva on 67/100.
Where each one leads
CognitiveID
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Imperva
- our overall score: 67/100 against 41/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 84/100 against 2/100
- headcount: 1,700 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 75,709 against 123
At a glance
| Measure | CognitiveID | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybersecurity company detecting real users by analyzing cognitive, physiological, and behavioral traits. | Imperva is a cybersecurity leader protecting critical applications, APIs, and data for organizations globally with an integrated security approach. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Authentication, Threat Detection | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Application Security, Data Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | Not published | San Mateo, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CognitiveID | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | 1,700 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +17.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $75.7M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $10.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 123 | 75,709 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CognitiveID | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 41/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 35/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 27/100 | 57/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 2/100 | 84/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CognitiveID | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
CognitiveID vs Imperva: common questions
Which is better, CognitiveID or Imperva?
On our 0-100 score Imperva rates higher (67/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CognitiveID and Imperva compare on the numbers?
Imperva leads on our overall score (67/100 against 41/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 22/100), domain rating (84/100 against 2/100), headcount (1,700 against 2), LinkedIn following (75,709 against 123).
Read the full CognitiveID review and pricing or the Imperva review and pricing. You can also browse other CognitiveID alternatives we track.