Cognition AI vs nao Labs
Cognition AI vs nao Labs, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cognition AI is on 75/100 and nao Labs on 48/100.
Where each one leads
Cognition AI
- our overall score: 75/100 against 48/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 35/100
- LinkedIn following: 6,150 against 3,542
nao Labs
- agent readiness: 72/100 against 53/100
- headcount: 39 against 5
At a glance
| Measure | Cognition AI | nao Labs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Building Devin, the first autonomous software engineer, to act as an exponential collaborator for human engineers. | AI code editor for data teams to ship data faster and ensure data quality. |
| Category | AI Coding Assistant, AI Copilot, Agentic AI, Foundation Model | Agentic AI, AI Coding Assistant, Data Platform, MLOps |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cognition AI | nao Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5 | 39 |
| Total funding | $1.6B | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| Valuation | $26B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,150 | 3,542 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cognition AI | nao Labs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 75/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 16/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 83/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | 88/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | B (72/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 35/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cognition AI | nao Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Notion |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Plausible |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Cognition AI | nao Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | AI code editor, Create SQL pipelines, Work with dbt, Run analytics, Create Python pipelines, Native data connection |
Cognition AI vs nao Labs: common questions
Which is better, Cognition AI or nao Labs?
On our 0-100 score Cognition AI rates higher (75/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cognition AI and nao Labs compare on the numbers?
Cognition AI leads on our overall score (75/100 against 48/100), domain rating (76/100 against 35/100), LinkedIn following (6,150 against 3,542). nao Labs leads on agent readiness (72/100 against 53/100), headcount (39 against 5).
Read the full Cognition AI review and pricing or the nao Labs review and pricing. You can also browse other Cognition AI alternatives we track.