Cognition AI vs GPT Codex
Cognition AI vs GPT Codex, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cognition AI is on 75/100 and GPT Codex on 21/100.
Where each one leads
Cognition AI
- our overall score: 75/100 against 21/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 45/100
GPT Codex
- domain rating: 97/100 against 76/100
- headcount: 6,582 against 5
- LinkedIn following: 6,371,681 against 6,150
At a glance
| Measure | Cognition AI | GPT Codex |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Building Devin, the first autonomous software engineer, to act as an exponential collaborator for human engineers. | AI-powered code generation and understanding platform, formerly GPT Codex. |
| Category | AI Coding Assistant, AI Copilot, Agentic AI, Foundation Model | AI Coding Assistant, AI Copilot, Developer Tools, Foundation Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | Not published |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cognition AI | GPT Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5 | 6,582 |
| Total funding | $1.6B | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| Valuation | $26B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,150 | 6,371,681 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cognition AI | GPT Codex |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 75/100 | 21/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 83/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 88/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 97/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cognition AI | GPT Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Bootstrap |
What users say
| Measure | Cognition AI | GPT Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 3 negative across 6 threads |
“I’ve spent 3 months building a 4X space strategy game almost entirely through ChatGPT/Codex agents. I’ve been working nonstop for about three months on a space strategy game called Galactum Meridian , and almost everything has been prompt-d”r/codex
Cognition AI vs GPT Codex: common questions
Which is better, Cognition AI or GPT Codex?
On our 0-100 score Cognition AI rates higher (75/100 against 21/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cognition AI and GPT Codex compare on the numbers?
Cognition AI leads on our overall score (75/100 against 21/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 45/100). GPT Codex leads on domain rating (97/100 against 76/100), headcount (6,582 against 5), LinkedIn following (6,371,681 against 6,150).
What do real users say about Cognition AI and GPT Codex?
GPT Codex: 1 positive and 3 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/codex.
Read the full Cognition AI review and pricing or the GPT Codex review and pricing. You can also browse other Cognition AI alternatives we track.